For decades, the world has looked to the United States as a beacon of democracy, where transparency, respect for the rule of law, and open discourse form the bedrock of its governance.
However, in the lead-up to the current presidential election, I find myself both confused and disillusioned.
As an observer from Malaysia, I’ve always held US governance in high regard. Yet recent developments have caused me to question whether the pillars of democracy in the United States are beginning to weaken.
Power and divisive rhetoric: The Trump factor
Former President Donald Trump, seeking a return to the Oval Office, has adopted a campaign strategy that many would argue is divisive. His rhetoric has not only targeted political rivals, such as Vice President Kamala Harris, but also undermined fundamental institutions, including the justice system and electoral processes.
His language, often laced with insults – calling Harris “stupid” or “dumb” – seems more focused on character attacks than policy debates. This style does not reflect the high standards once expected from a former president and leader of a democratic nation.
Trump’s narrative also includes claims of election fraud, specifically alleging that his previous loss was due to a “rigged” election. However, despite multiple legal investigations and reviews, no concrete evidence has been presented to substantiate these claims. This baseless insistence fuels doubt in the electoral system and encourages scepticism among his supporters, casting a shadow on the credibility of US elections at a global level.
The pursuit of personal power over national interest
It’s difficult not to see Trump’s actions as being driven by personal ambition rather than the national good. His remarks about sacking officials who opposed him and using force to “set things right” are disconcerting, coming from someone aspiring to a role where impartiality and public service should come first.
These assertions, coupled with his ongoing disdain for former officials who’ve spoken against him, indicate a willingness to prioritise personal grievances over national unity.
And yet, despite these controversies, Trump remains almost equally popular with a considerable segment of voters. His approval in polls suggests that his message still resonates with millions. Why? Partly because his rhetoric has successfully tapped into a sense of disenfranchisement and frustration among certain groups of Americans. To these voters, Trump’s approach may feel like a form of rebellion against an establishment they perceive as disconnected from their reality.
Escalating rhetoric: A slippery slope
Vice President Kamala Harris has not remained silent either, responding to Trump’s provocations with terms such as “fascist.”
This language, while perhaps understandable given the relentless personal attacks, only escalates the divisive nature of the campaign. It fosters a “tit-for-tat” environment, eroding any hope for constructive dialogue. As the election draws near, the rhetoric from both sides intensifies, leaving little room for substantive policy discussions that voters so desperately need.
Concerns for democracy and global implications
The US Constitution grants the president significant power – power that could be used or misused depending on the individual in office. Trump’s claim that he might pardon himself if re-elected raises critical questions about checks and balances. The fear among many is that a second Trump administration might erode democratic norms further, setting a precedent where personal interest supersedes national interest.
The US has historically championed democracy and has been a role model for nations worldwide. As an observer, I wonder: Can the United States continue to uphold this leadership role if internal divisions continue to deepen? What message does this send to emerging democracies that aspire to emulate the American model?
The upcoming election on Nov 5 represents more than a choice between candidates; it is a critical test of American democracy itself. For the United States to reclaim its moral authority on the world stage, it must overcome the divisive tendencies currently dominating its political landscape.
